Reflections on Jussie Smollett's Last Meal Request

Imagining what Jussie Smollett, the controversial figure accused of staging a racist hate crime, would request for his last meal is an interesting thought experiment. Several individuals have weighed in on this hypothetical scenario, each with their own perspective and preference. While the topic is sensitive, it offers a unique opportunity to reflect on the underlying issues.

The Humble Pie Perspective

Some individuals, like the person referred to as Fuzzie Zoeller, seem to have a more lighthearted attitude. According to them, Smollett's last meal request might be something absurd or unusual, such as 'chitins grits or whatever the hell they eat.' Despite this light-hearted approach, it is important to address the serious nature of the incident.

The Sincere Criticism

Others take a more critical stance. One such perspective criticizes Smollett's actions, describing him as a 'lowlife racist SOB' who is 'too good for the death penalty.' This critic envisions a more severe punishment, stating that Smollett 'would much rather see him in for a couple of years being treated like the bitch he is by a massive white guy named Bubba.' This viewpoint aligns with the belief that Smollett intentionally set up an attack to blame another group, categorizing him as 'a disgrace to Blacks and Gays.'

The critic also expresses a sense of relief that Smollett 'can’t reproduce,' implying the concern that his actions could lead to further spread of misinformation and harm. This viewpoint underscores the broader implications of his actions and the need for accountability.

A Humble/tasty Substitute

Amidst these critical views, there are those who offer a more constructive suggestion. For instance, some propose a simple but genuine meal, such as a submarine sandwich. This approach suggests that even in his final moments, a person might simply ask for a comforting, familiar meal. This reflects the concept that in times of stress or crisis, basic human needs and desires can remain unchanged.

The Ultimate Irony

A more sarcastic response might humorously suggest a meal of a MAGA hat, one of the distinctive items from the fake attack Smollett staged. This suggestion posits humorously that 'What it should be is a MAGA hat, one of the ones he used in his fake attack. He should keep chewing and chewing. Eventually, he’ll break it down. After that, he can chew up the string.' This suggestion uses irony to address the absurdity of the incident and the resulting PR disaster.

The final twist in this scenario is the recognition that Smollett isn’t on death row. Most likely, the only 'positive' aspect that can be derived from this situation is that 'He can’t reproduce,' suggesting a societal relief. However, this scenario invites further reflection on the broader implications of the incident and the need for accountability and justice.

In conclusion, Jussie Smollett's hypothetical last meal request not only serves as a light-hearted reflection but also provides an opportunity to delve into deeper issues of morality, justice, and societal impact. His actions continue to draw attention and discussion, making such musings both entertaining and thought-provoking.