Miguel and His Family Prove Ernesto de la Cruz Murdered Hector: A Closer Look at the Evidence in Coco
In the animated film Coco, Miguel and his family endeavor to exonerate their true ancestor, Hector, who was framed for crimes committed by Ernesto de la Cruz. The climax of the movie presents a compelling case supported by various forms of evidence. In this article, we will explore how Miguel and his family manage to prove that Ernesto de la Cruz murdered Hector.
Unearthing the Evidence
The key piece of evidence that Miguel and his family reveal is a video recording of Hector performing one of his songs. This recording serves as the cornerstone of the case, revealing the truth behind Ernesto's true identity: he is a man who stole Hector's songs and claimed them as his own to gain fame and fortune.
Miguel discovers that Hector was a prolific songwriter who had contributed many of the songs that became Ernesto's hits. However, when Hector tried to claim credit for his work, Ernesto killed him to steal his songs. This discovery is made denser by the presence of other crucial pieces of evidence:
Memories and Stories from Miguel's Family
Miguel and his family, particularly his maternal grandmother, Mama Imelda, share memories and stories that highlight Hector's identity and contributions to music. These stories provide further context and validation of their claim. Mama Imelda, in particular, despite her age and the possible onset of dementia, still manages to recall significant details about Hector's life and his work, offering a poignant counter-narrative to Ernesto's portrayal.
The Live Feed Evidence
The most compelling evidence, however, is presented at the climax of the movie in a live feed from the concert. Ernesto de la Cruz, during his performance, confesses to killing Hector. This confession is a direct and undeniable piece of evidence that aligns with the other evidence previously gathered by Miguel and his family.
While there are no official statements or legal documents proving Ernesto de la Cruz's crime, the combination of the video evidence, the familial testimonies, and the televised confession build a compelling case for the townsfolk and the viewers. The town, which is filled with animators and musicians, finds it difficult to dismiss the evidence.
The Skeptics' Perspective
Not everyone is convinced by Miguel's and his family's claims. Some, such as the elderly Coco, whose reliability is questioned due to possible dementia, may not be considered credible. Moreover, Miguel's family's testimony is based on their word, which does not provide concrete proof in the eyes of some.
Some argue that the townsfolk, who have a vested interest in maintaining the image of Ernesto de la Cruz, might not believe Miguel's and his family's claims. However, the live feed confession from Ernesto de la Cruz, which is witnessed by a large audience, including Ernesto's own fans, provides a powerful and tangible piece of evidence that is difficult to refute.
Conclusion
The movie Coco presents a well-crafted narrative that builds a case for Hector's true identity and the crimes committed by Ernesto de la Cruz using a combination of video evidence, familial testimonies, and a live feed confession. These elements form a compelling case that serves as both a narrative and a form of justice for Miguel and his family.
Although some may question the reliability of Mama Coco's memory and the testimony of Miguel's family, the live feed evidence provided by Ernesto de la Cruz himself serves as a powerful proof of his crimes. The climax of the movie effectively uses multiple layers of evidence to build a convincing narrative that honors Hector and exposes Ernesto de la Cruz for the fraud he was.