Using 'Void' or 'Voidself' does not inherently make fun of pronouns. It can be a genuine way for someone to express their gender identity. However, it is crucial to approach the use of any pronouns, including neopronouns, with the utmost respect and understanding. If these terms resonate with you and you feel comfortable using them, it’s perfectly valid to do so. Nonetheless, it is essential to communicate your pronouns clearly and foster open discussions about them.

Arguments Against Void and Voidself

Despite their recognition by some, others argue that 'Void' and 'Voidself' are not valid as neopronouns. They contend that using such terms will only confuse people and may not be respected by others. Here are some reasons they provide:

Pronouns as Functional Language

Many argue that pronouns serve a practical purpose in communication, particularly in the clarity of speech and writing. Words like 'void' or 'voidself' might not carry the same grammatical functions as traditional pronouns and can lead to misunderstandings. These arguments suggest that the primary role of pronouns is to function as references and descriptors, rather than as unique identifiers of personality.

Consistency and Acceptance

There are instances where people have employed these terms in fictional or personal profiles as a playful addition to one's identity. However, consistent and widespread usage in regular speech and writing remains limited. Some argue that these terms are more of a stylistic choice or a way to add a sense of personal flavor, rather than functional language. Consistent usage in regular communication seems to be missing.

Example Conversations

Let’s consider the following made-up conversation to further illustrate the potential challenges of using 'Void' and 'Voidself':

Person 1: "Sharon is coming to the party tonight. Make sure to be there to greet void."

Person 2: "To greet who?"

Person 1: "Void…" (exhausted breath)

Person 2: "Who the f*ck is void?"

Person 1: "Void isn’t a real person; those are Sharon’s preferred pronouns."

Person 2: "Who in their right mind would use void/voidself as pronouns? When did those become a thing?"

Person 1: "I have no idea. Just use they/them if you want."

Person 2: "I will use they/them. I am not using that jumbled mess."

This example highlights the potential confusion and the reluctance some people might have when encountering these terms in regular conversation. While you can set these terms as your preferred pronouns, they might not be understood or used consistently by others.

Conclusion

Whether 'Void' and 'Voidself' are valid neopronouns is subjective and largely dependent on individual preferences and social contexts. Some people find them a meaningful and valid part of their gender identity expression, while others believe they are not practical for everyday usage. It is essential to approach the use of any pronouns, including neopronouns, with respect and understanding, especially when communicating with others about your pronouns.

In conclusion, 'Void' and 'Voidself' can indeed be valid neopronouns if they resonate with you and you feel comfortable using them. However, it is crucial to recognize the challenges these terms might pose in consistent, everyday communication.