Introduction

Facebook, a platform with over 2.9 billion monthly active users, has evolved from a social media giant to a multifaceted tool for communication and debate. In this article, we delve into the experiences of an individual who participated in both religious and political debates on the platform. We will explore whether these interactions were worthwhile, particularly in a context characterized by heightened scrutiny and censorship.

Religious Debates on Facebook

Engaging in religious debates on Facebook opens a Pandora’s box of varying opinions, emotions, and sometimes hostility. The author of this piece found himself at the center of a vocal religious debate group after declaring that God spoke to him and had declared him the Messiah. The response was overwhelming, ranging from support to intense criticism.

The positive aspect of these debates, for the author, was the global connection it brought. Interacting with people from different walks of life broadened his perspective and allowed him to engage in meaningful discussions. However, the constant backlash and negativity can be tiring and discouraging. Yet, the author chose not to see it as a complete waste of time, given the valuable insights and connections gained.

A Case in Point

One of the more significant instances of debate occurred in 2018 when the author was asked to defend Brett Kavanaugh, a figure mired in controversy. The author claimed that a prophetic vision foretold his need to defend a particular figure, leading him to join a political Facebook group. His posts defending Kavanaugh generated significant attention, which caught the attention of a skeptical attorney who requested evidence.

Connecting to the FBI

The author’s posts and evidence led him to visit the Dallas FBI office, presenting his argument to an agent. Despite the agent’s reluctance to confirm his claims, the author remained persistent. To encourage others to verify his information, he shared his story on Facebook, calling for independent confirmation from the public.

Beyond the initial interaction, the author also took steps to address another critical issue, the college admission scandal. Recognizing the broader implications, he decided to reach out to the FBI for a second time, discussing the need for a more equitable approach in dealing with such corruption cases.

Reflections and Final Thoughts

The author’s experiences on Facebook reflect the double-edged nature of social media platforms. While the platform can be a powerful tool for advocacy and connection, it is also riddled with censorship and repercussions. In the end, the author decided to discontinue his Facebook presence due to the censorship and negativity surrounding his posts.

The question of whether Facebook is a waste of time remains subjective. For those passionate about engaging in meaningful debates and making an impact, the benefits can outweigh the drawbacks. However, the constant scrutiny and censorship can be disheartening, prompting users to consider alternative platforms or methods of communication.

Ultimately, the author's journey serves as a reminder of the importance of discernment in choosing where to share one's ideas and perspectives. While social media can be a powerful tool, it requires careful consideration of the potential consequences and the values it upholds.

Amen!