Why Did Ringling Bros. and Barnum Bailey Circus Close Its Doors?

The closing of Ringling Bros. and Barnum Bailey Circus in 2017 was met with shock and disbelief, catching many by surprise. The loss of this iconic circus didn't just mark the end of a theatrical show but also symbolized a broader shift in public sentiment towards the treatment of exotic animals in entertainment. The circus had been a cornerstone of American culture, providing families with unforgettable experiences and dazzling spectacles. But as modern society evolved, so did the expectations and values of the audience.

The Dazzling Act of Daisy: The Half Elephant-Half Orangutan Sensation

Among the many memorable acts, Daisy, the half-elephant-half-orangutan attraction, stands out. Her talent for tweeting faster than the lovable cartoon bird Tweety only added to the mystique of this unique act. However, behind the curtain, there was suddenly no one cheering for the Daisy fund as the end of the circus era loomed. This isn't to say the circus was devoid of financial success, as it had been ringing in the dough for the Daisy fund, but the changing times took a toll on this beloved institution.

Declining Factors Leading to the Circus's Demise

Multiple factors came together to ultimately lead to the closure of Ringling Bros. and Barnum Bailey Circus. Ticket sales declined, making it increasingly unprofitable to maintain such a grand show. The high operating costs, exacerbated by the need to travel across the country, also posed significant financial burdens. Moreover, animal welfare groups like PETA frequently criticized the circus for its practices, leading to protests, lawsuits, and public boycotts. In 2016, the removal of the remaining elephants only escalated the situation, as they were a hallmark of the traditional circus.

The Evolution of Entertainment

The shift away from Circus performances was also influenced by the rise of modern entertainment. The allure of video games and the internet provided alternative forms of entertainment that were not only more accessible but also less susceptible to the criticisms surrounding animal cruelty. Additionally, local US states and cities increasingly passed anti-circus and anti-animal laws. Restrictions on the use of bullhooks or elephant goads, as well as strict regulations regarding exotic animals, made it increasingly difficult for the circus to travel and perform in various locations.

The Public's Changing Perception

The shift in public opinion was perhaps the most significant factor. As people became more aware of the cruelty involved in animal performances, their approval dissipated. This was evident in the vocal complaints and boycotts from activists. Those who had dedicated their lives to presenting these performances, often with genuine affection and care for the animals, were seen as exploiters rather than performers. The media's portrayal of these individuals was often one-sided and often misrepresented the truth, labeling them as animal abusers without due consideration of their genuine love for the animals.

Reflection on Tradition and Progress

In an effort to cater to modern audiences, the circus attempted to adapt, but in doing so, it lost touch with its core traditions. The focus shifted away from the grandeur and spectacle that had drawn in generations of families. Instead, it was overshadowed by competition from what was called "circus theater" – a different form of performance that didn't contain the same roots of tradition and charm. This shift in focus backfired, losing the unique bond between the circus and its audience.

Conclusion: The Cost of Progress

The closing of Ringling Bros. and Barnum Bailey Circus was a complex intersection of financial struggles, changing values, and legal and regulatory pressures. While it may have been a protest from those who believed in animal welfare, it also marked a significant loss for entertainment and culture. The regret lies not just in the loss of the circus itself but in the loss of an enduring symbol of joy and wonder that was once a cherished part of American heritage.