Why Some People Dislike Star Trek: Discovery Without Having Watched It
Introduction
The popular science fiction series Star Trek: Discovery has faced mixed reactions within the fan community. Some viewers criticize it without seeing the show, which can seem unusual at first glance. However, it's important to understand the context and underlying reasons for these disagreements. This article explores the concerns of those who dislike Star Trek: Discovery without having watched it, including issues with the show's premise, government portrayal, and canon establishment.
Dislike Without Watching: An Uncommon Yet Understandable Phenomenon
Not everyone who voices their opinion about a show has seen it. People often express their dislike based on preconceived notions, previous experiences, and societal expectations. In the case of Star Trek: Discovery, critics have pointed out several aspects that deter them from giving the show a chance:
Political and Moral Concerns: The show has been accused of taking a strong political stance, which some viewers see as unnecessary and off-putting. As one critic stated, "You don’t have to taste broccoli with topsoil all over it to know you hate it." The series' focus on political overtones can be seen as an unrealistic and unappealing deviation from the traditional canon. Contradictions in the Canon: The portrayal of technology, government structures, and ship designs in the new series often contrasts significantly with established canon. Fans of the franchise are well aware that the show’s setting and concepts might not align with their cherished memories or prior knowledge. This incoherence can be a turn-off for those who have a deep connection to the original series. Societal and Personal Context: The disputes over Discovery also reflect a broader debate within the fan community. Some enthusiasts feel alienated by the show's willingness to push boundaries and take risks, which some perceive as a reflection of the creators' desire to be relevant and influential. As one critic remarked, "They're catering to roughly 3 of the population - even many die-hard liberals don’t want to see this kind of political soapbox nonsense."The Franchise’s Legacy and Nostalgia
The franchise’s rich history and loyal following create a unique emotional context for fans. When a new series deviates significantly from established lore, it can be disorienting and potentially annoying. For example, the premise of Discovery, which involves a jump in time and introduced new characters, might be seen as a departure from the familiar and beloved era of the original series. Many fans note that the show’s rapidly changing timeline and shortcomings in maintaining continuity can make it less enjoyable.
One critic succinctly put it: "The laughable part in all this - you’ve force-fed us dirt on ice cream and we told you it stinks. Yet you’re so arrogant as to think we’re gonna suddenly grow an urge to eat crap. We get it, you’re different. We don’t care. Don’t change - stay what you are - but STOP trying to make us like something that goes so directly against who we are and have been always." This sentiment highlights the resistance to creative changes within a beloved franchise.
Conclusion
While it might seem counterintuitive, disliking Star Trek: Discovery without having watched it is a legitimate and understandable stance. The show's ideological leanings, changes in the canon, and focus on political themes can alienate certain fans who prefer a more traditional and established storyline. It's important to recognize that fan opinions should be respected, even if they differ from what the creators intended.
The key takeaway is that each viewer brings their own set of experiences and preferences to the table, and while it's beneficial to watch a show before forming an opinion, it's also valid to dislike it based on prior knowledge and an understanding of its potential impact on the franchise.